Whoa! How’s that for a sensational blog title? It’s only partly accurate, but it did pop into mind when I learned through Jersey Blogs at The Star Ledger that the Feds foiled a terrorist plot to attack Fort Dix. “Live from The Ledger” reports that “six people were arrested.”
Federal investigators last night arrested six Islamic radicals who were planning a heavily armed attack against soldiers at Fort Dix as part of a jihad against America, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
In a statement released this morning that confirmed an earlier report on nj.com, The Star-Ledger’s Web site, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said the men planned to “kill as many soldiers as possible.” (Live from The Ledger)
I was out of it yesterday. Had root canal at the dentist with happy gas and missed all the excitement. However, when I read about this latest terrorist plot, one that All Spin Zone says sounds like a move, the first thing I recalled was how New Jersey had to reform its Motor Vehicles Administration procedures for drivers licenses following the 911 WTC attack when law enforcement realized how many terrorists and potential terrorists had an easy time getting fake licenses through Jersey. No, I’m not having a false memory here. Read this from a 2001 CNN report:
NEW YORK (CNN) — During the two weeks since hijacked airliners crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, investigators have focused on New Jersey as a possible hub of terrorist activity. (CNN)
And then there was the alleged arms deal in August 2003 where a terrorist was arrested at a hotel by the Newark International Airport. The man arrested, Hemant Lakhani, was a British citizen of Indian descent. He was later convicted, but said he was innocent and thought he was working with Russian Intelligence.
The Fort Dix Six are not Arab
According to “Live from The Ledger,” only one of the Fort Dix Six was born in an Arab nation, which is Jordan:
Four are ethnic Albanians, one was born in Turkey, and a sixth was born in Jordan, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Turkey is considered a Eurasian nation.
The blog at Simply Left Behind points out that the six men arrested in the Fort Dix sting were not brown-skinned and so do not fit the standard racial profiling criteria in this country for terrorists. I’ve said before that we’re all in danger because we’re focused on who looks Arab. The last time I mentioned it I talked about the suspicious Norwegian.
Life imitates art? Not quite.
I was watching CBS’ Numb3s Friday night. (Yes, again!) On it terrorists bought military clothing from a military supply store and also created some passable fake IDs. At first the FBI thought the terrorists intended to attack a military base, but later they realized that the terrorists intended to poison the civilian water supply with Sarin, not in Jersey but in California. They needed fake military IDs and military uniforms to fool security at a defense contractor site storing chemicals.
I remember thinking, Would it really be that easy to infiltrate a U.S. military base? So, when I heard the news today that the Feds have thwarted a dubious terrorist plot to attack a military base in NJ, I can’t help but say, “Hmm, spoooky.” Coinkydink, I’m sure, but you can watch the Numb3rs episode at CBS’ Innertube
I also had thoughts similar to another blogger, which are didn’t Republicans say keeping our troops in Iraq would help keep terrorists away from America?
Republicans blasted (Democrat Harry)Reid’s comments on the House floor Thursday night. … Lawmakers responded to Reid’s comments, saying the nation cannot give up the fight in Iraq or it will face terrorists on American soil. (Source)
Last week as Bush explained why he vetoed the war-spending bill, and war supporters declared we’ll be safe as long as troops stay in Iraq, I thought that particular argument for staying in that country didn’t make sense. I mean it seems to me that if you piss people off by blowing up their country and leaving it in worse shape than when you found it, and some of them truly believe they are in a holy war commanded by God, then wouldn’t it be likely that they and their sympathizers will mobilize to increase terrorist acts?
Originally posted at the dead blog, Confessions of a Jersey Goddess, Wednesday, April 18, 2007. May contain non-zombified links.
I was exhausted when I returned from covering a local election last night, but still surfing the web I saw this excellent post by Professor Kim Pearson at BlogHer.org on covering tragedies like the Virginia Tech shooting. Both professional journalists and citizen journalists aka some bloggers should read it. (Link to post.)
The post is entitled “Covering tragedy: Emerging lessons from the Virginia Tech Killings.” One aspect of covering tragedy that Professor Kim discusses is when it’s appropriate to mention an alleged perpetrator’s race/ethnic background. She gives the following advice:
Be thoughtful about stereotypes. When the initial reporting identified the suspect as an “Asian male,” the Asian American Journalists Association felt compelled to remind journalists of the rule that race should only be included in a news story when it is clearly relevant …
I mentioned the reported ethnicity of the Virginia Tech shooter now identified as Cho Seung-Hui on the first day of this crisis in my blog. I mentioned it once from the standpoint that MSNBC reported the shooter was Asian and “experts” were already as early as 2:20 the same day discussing Asian males in western culture and again when I heard news reports that the shooter didn’t have ID and the police were trying to figure out which body was his body.
Both mentions are in the same post but the post is a rolling report with time stamps. Both times I mentioned ethnicity I questioned myself: Why tell this detail? I knew people would start trying to make a deal of the race of the shooter, and I also thought, Please let this young man be here legally; otherwise, folks are going to start getting nasty about illegal immigrants in the country.
Cho Seung-Hui was in this country legally. Reports say he moved to the United States from South Korea in 1992. However, does his nationality, ethnic background, or how he got here have any baring on his crime?
I remembered Bill O’Reilly and his shouting match with Geraldo Rivera after a drunk driving tragedy. As Rachel Sklar said in The Huffington Post, “the driver happened to be an illegal alien.” Rivera points out before the two start screaming at each other that the drunk driving tragedy is not an illegal alien story; it’s a drunk driving story.
Race: The American Obsesion
Almost immediately I saw hits to my blog from both America and countries in Asia. The surfers searched the string “Asian Virginia Tech” or “Asian shooter.” I figured the people were probably divided into four groups: (1.) those who were shocked that the shooter may have been of Asian descent, (2.) those who were Asian and felt a sense of shame that someone Asian may be connected to such horror, (3.) those who were checking out rumors or trying to verify information, and (4.) those who wanted to find a reason to villanize people of Asian descent.
When people try to make sense of tragedies and find reasons for wrongdoing, it seems some folks inevitably go for the most simplistic reasons and the most divisive too. Ethnicity of the perpetrator is an easy target to some people as they look for ways to explain horror, especially if the person who is looking for targets already leans toward racist explanations.
I also heard early that it was a “Chinese graduate student.” However, I tossed that out thinking what’s the likelihood anyone knows this soon the nationality of the shooter? They’re probably hearing this stuff from traumatized witnesses who aren’t sure yet of exactly what they saw.
It’s possible that I was more sensitive to this type of reporting because I remember being a little girl in New Orleans and how I felt every time a news reporter mentioned a crime and seemed to make a point of sharing that the alleged perpetrator was a black man. At a young age I noticed they didn’t tell you race at all if an alleged perpetrator was white.
Yet, I think the reason we have to be careful about reporting race and avoid mentioning ethnicity in crimes is not because it’s bad to give detailed descriptions that include ethnic background. Good writing in the traditional sense would say tell details when you have facts. We have to be careful with details like race/ethnicity because America suffers a type of insanity when it comes to race. Many still try to make sense of the world based on skin color and ethnicity.
I say America because I know America, but I believe this is a global problem. Consider this post that involves assigning blame in Great Britain. It seems all over the world people are keeping score about which ethnic group does what, ignoring other factors for why humans do what they do.
Race: The Pink Elephant in the Room
The Virginia Tech story reminded me of the first time a black male was the perpetrator in a mass shooting. People reported it not the way they usually report crimes committed by black people, like “Well, it’s a black man again.” They reported it like, “Oh my God! It’s a black man. I didn’t know black men did these kinds of things. I thought only white guys did that.”
Reporters didn’t come out and say it that way on the news with an air of obvious shock. Instead they pummeled experts with questions asking them to explain what it meant that a black man had done the deed rather than a middle-class white male, which had been the profile of spree killers for a years.
This brings me to profiling. Profiles for types of criminals often include race. In the case of the Baton Rouge serial killer police were accused of wasting valuable time finding the possible real killer partially because they based their investigation on a serial killer profile that such killers are intelligent but psychotic white males. They ended up arresting a black man.
There’s probably nothing wrong with considering the race of potential perpetrators when it comes to law enforcement trying to track down a certain type of crime. But when law enforcement and everyday people leap beyond that to being suspicious of all people of a certain race absent of other indicators like anti-social behavior, we place society at greater danger.
When we look at race rather than behavior we endanger ourselves because we overlook other critical clues that suggest a threat. I worked for a while at Newark International Airport and noticed a tall, well-dressed, blond-haired, blue-eyed man shooting video of baggage handlers putting bags on planes. I stood at my kiosk and observed him for a while and the thought crossed my mind, They keep telling us to report suspicious behavior. I bet nobody’s questioning what he’s doing because he doesn’t look like he’s of Arab descent. He’s a white guy. So, I went up to him smiling and asked, “What are you doing?”
He told me he was shooting video for a television station in his country. I listened to his accent and said, “Cool. Your accent? Icelandic?” He said he was from Norway and started to look uncomfortable. I said, “Oh, don’t worry about me. I work over there. I’m not with security. I’m in sales.” We talked a few minutes more and then I left. I went back to my kiosk and started scanning the corridor for security.
When I told two police officers about the man they said, “It’s not illegal to shoot video.” I said I know but shooting video of how the baggage handlers put luggage on the plane seems like something someone should check out. Then one of the officers said, “I wonder if anyone’s checked his press credentials. Show us.” I turned around and looked toward my kiosk then spotted the man with his camera quickly hauling his butt down the corridor. The officers took off after him.
I don’t know what happened and it was probably nothing. He could have been running for his flight. Nevertheless, a few days later Newark Airport was shut down for a while. Agents busted people involved in a weapons deal. The arrested were not of Arab descent. They were Europeans.
Disturbing behavior should be our focus when we’re on the look out for crime. Not skin color or ethnicity. When we hear of horrible crimes like the one at Virginia Tech, we never hear anyone say of the shooter, “Oh, but he was so happy, helpful, laughing all the time.” We hear words like angry, loner, or withdrawn.
In the VT shooters case we hear words like “stalked women.” I wonder how long some people like the Virginia Tech shooter go with no one reaching out to them. In the case of the VT shooter, a professor, Lucinda Roy, the woman pictured in this section, did reach out to the young man, but her hands were tied to help him beyond her capabilities. More unsettling is the recent revelation that a judge had ruled Cho Seung-Hui mentally ill in 2005.
Yet even with this bit of information about mental illness we must be careful. Everyone with a mental illness is not dangerous. A mental illness could be a tendency toward light depression. Despite being associated with suicide, not all depressed people are suicidal or homicidal. Not all women who suffer bipolar disorder are attracted to young boys as some media coverage/talk show discussions suggested when child molester Debra Lafave blamed her sexual relationship with a teenage boy on mental illness.
Not all those who suffer from schizophrenia are violent. I mention schizophrenia because an expert on Oprah today said based on Cho Seung-Hui’s writings he may have had the type of break with reality indicative of some forms of schizophrenia. Notice I said “may have had” and “some.” I’ve noticed that people tend to overlook qualifiers so they can paint those unlike themselves with the broad brush of being dangerous.
If we want to be vigilant, we should look for symptoms not our misunderstanding about mental health diagnoses, and before we point fingers we should talk to a professional who knows about mental illness. Morra Aarons gives a list of red flag symptoms in her post about VT shootings and a possible domestic violence connection.
Danger: Humans crossing
I think that when it comes to crime and heinous acts we will eventually accept that ethnicity has nothing to do with our madness, that when it comes to acts of violence it’s the ugly side of our humanity that joins us: The human capacity for inhumanity to humans is the tie that binds us to deadly deeds. The human capacity for violence is the demon we must face together.
Originally published at the dead blog, Confessions of a Jersey Goddess, Friday, May 04, 2007. So, some of the links may not be zombified, just dead.
I sort of don’t know what to say about The Jersey Guys feud with New Jersey State Troopers and the troopers union official who publicly released one of the Jersey Guys’ personal address and contact information. I’m unsure of what to say because it’s The Jersey Guys we’re talking about of New Jersey 101.5 FM. These fellas aren’t known for being responsible when it comes to handling information or considering how the words that come out of their mouths will affect others’ lives and sometimes safety. So, maybe the release of Craig Carton’s home address is a case of karma or what goes around comes around. For you Sunday School alumni, that’s you reap what you sow.
It seems The Jersey Guys decided to inform the public that our “wonderful” state troopers were about to go on “a ticket-writing blitz,” according to a story at The Bridgewater Courier. Divulging this information, that the story says The Jersey Guys picked off trooper message boards, pissed off the troopers’ union.
Angered that a popular radio show drew attention to police message board posts calling for a ticket-writing blitz, the head of the state troopers’ union Thursday said the show had endangered police and showed television cameras the home address and license plate number of New Jersey 101.5 FM personality Craig Carton.
In a blistering news conference, state police union leader David Jones said more motorists have been confrontational during traffic stops since Carton, and then Gannett New Jersey newspapers, publicized the chatter about stepped-up ticket writing, which anonymous posters discussed on a password-protected message board for union members.
Jones opened his news conference by holding up a paper with Carton’s home information, which he held in front of him for the duration of his remarks.
“I’m going to release the names and addresses of these people and then their sponsors, and all of the car dealerships and everybody else that sponsors that show is going to have to deal with the reality that they’re putting public servants and the public in general in harm’s way, and I’m going to make sure that everybody knows, until they get their act together, who these people are, where they live, what they do and how it is that they’re misleading the public and creating this furor,” Jones said.
He later said he wanted to show that a host of the “Jersey Guys” lives in Pennsylvania. (From The Courier story)
How unJersey of one of The Jersey Guys to live in Pennsylvania. But yikes! Would you want your personal address released to the public if you spent part of your day insulting people publicly?
Furthermore, The Star Ledger reports that state police are investigating Jones’ alleged threat against The Jersey Guys. A state police spokesman also said that Jones was speaking on behalf of the union not on behalf of New Jersey State Troopers.
Per The Courier, Carton responded with the following:
My safety and more importantly the safety of my family is paramount to me, and I can not and will not allow them to be put in harm’s way because of the misguided rantings of a powerful police figure.
His safety and his family’s safety are important to him as they should be. I get that, but I wonder how much Carton considers the safety of others when he and his colleague Ray Rossi do their shock jock routine.
I bet if a few of the people of New Jersey who are of Latino and Mexican descent could’ve handed out one or both of The Jersey Guys’ personal information a few weeks back, someone would’ve done so. After all, didn’t The Jersey Guys in essence encourage ordinary citizens to harass private citizens of Latino and Mexican descent with their “La Cucha Gotcha” game? It was their version of “find the illegal alien” game, and they encouraged their faithful listeners to play. The game’s name alone suggests which group The Jersey Guys felt should be targeted.
The masses playing the game didn’t need to know your personal address to harass you. They just needed to notice you at work and find your skin coloring or your last name to be “unAmerican” and therefore suspect. It was okay with The Jersey Guys for people to be harassed and possibly endangered based on appearance and last name just a few weeks back.
The Art of Reckoning and The Jersey Guys
So, now the state troopers have a game for The Jersey Guys. We know it as “tit for tat; you kill my dog, I kill your cat.” In this case I guess we could say, “You put the troopers in danger, they put you in range of obsessed fans and psychopaths.” Ouch!
According to a recent episode of Numb3rs on CBS called “The Art of Reckoning,” using a Tit for Tat strategy when you want to get information from a prisoner can be very effective. In game theory it’s called equivocation and has to do with rational self-interest, “the prisoner’s dilemma.” Some folks say tit for tat is what we used in the Cold War to break Russia, but it can backfire if one party is extremely stubborn or possibly nuts.
Note for NonGeeks: “Game theory is a branch of mathematics that has many more important and far-reaching applications than the name may imply, such as in warfare and business.” (PDF source)
The state troopers aren’t trying to get information from The Jersey Guys in this case, but apparently they do think they’re at war. They also skipped the first step of the game, which is both parties, selfish agents, mimic cooperation. (Uh, maybe the troopers feel they were cooperating by not releasing Carton’s personal data sooner.) It seems the troopers want to teach those Jersey Guys a lesson now about putting troopers’ lives in danger by putting one of The Jersey Guys in danger. I guess the troopers hope The Jersey Guys will learn that it would be in their rational self-interest to not do that again! Or maybe Jones tends to over-react. What do we know about this guy?
Can you say lawsuit?
I don’t know if The Jersey Guys have grounds to sue, but this is pretty hairy, scary stuff here. Again, according to The Courier story, the chief operating officer of Millennium Radio New Jersey, Andrew Santoro, called for an investigation. The article also reports that Carton and Rossi walked off their radio show after Jones’ news conference revealing Carton’s personal data.
I agree that Jones, the union guy, is using intimidation tactics. I don’t condone what Jones did, and certainly knowing the reputation of Jersey State Troopers, that they’ve abused their power in the past, I’m not going to cheer one of their union reps on in what seems to be another example of power mania.
What if something happens to Carton’s family? Did his family do anything to deserve having their lives in danger if some obsessed fan decides to pay them a visit or more likely some angry listener?
Still, for The Jersey Guys this entire situation may be a case of what I already suggested, karma. As the old folks used to say, “You’ve made your bed; now lie in it!”